Someone wrote in [personal profile] anticirclejerk 2012-03-15 02:52 am (UTC)

another da

You really think an answer from you would be acceptable by this attitude?

I... never really claimed to play 100% canon Setsuna. The headcanon page exists for a reason. I disliked the character development he received in the second season, for the most part, so I've instead developed the character in a different direction."

Canon is canon. No matter how much you dislike it, canon is canon. You, or anyone else, do not have the right to steer any canon character in a different direction only because you, or they, dislike the developments.

This is called forming an AU version, in lighter terms. In the worse terms or cases: turning ooc. You do not have the right to label him as canon!Setsuna if you are only going to barrage him with your bizarre headcanon all the way and then never regard his true developments in mind. Why would you even claim to /adore/ him if you are just going to ignore his every canon aspect and then form your own? You are not bringing him justice. You are buthering him. You are making people who respect his character feel otherwise, because of how you portray him as "disturbing" or "sex-oriented," because he is not. Nothing in canon states or hints that, it is only your own.

With how you're ignoring canon materials and refuse to acknowledge, especially the most important parts of this character: Your Setsuna does not have the right to be called "Setsuna F. Seiei," he is: "deus/desu/lisa!Setsuna F. Seiei."

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting