I'm sorry if I'm confusing you with another anon. But, again, I don't think I've ever said "THIS IS CANON GUYS" I've stated several times that it was indeed MY INTERPRETATION, and I don't see why you're saying I've done otherwise. I'm "getting huffy" because at least two people are assuming that I've said things I haven't. Seriously, please, quote me for where I'm saying that what I've said is a "canon fact" and not "my interpretation", because that's what you're accusing me of doing, yet the only thing you quoted was, precisely, a part where I said that it was, indeed, my own interpretation.
Re: pa