LOL That's cute backtracking there, but you'll notice from the fact that I quoted your exact words that that is indeed exactly what you said.
If you want someone not to call you on on what you say then get your facts straight first and (here's the kicker) think about what your words are actually saying before you click post.
No one reads what you mean to say. They read what you DO say. And what you said was that a character who calls herself gay is "pretty obviously bisexual" despite her own words otherwise. At no point did you say "it's not beyond the realm of possibility to have her attracted to a man." (Personally, I don't disagree with that. I think that with the right development it could definitely be possible, but that's neither here nor there.)
It's your poor fortune if you can't tell the difference between the statement that you did make and the one that you wanted to.
Re: ayrt
If you want someone not to call you on on what you say then get your facts straight first and (here's the kicker) think about what your words are actually saying before you click post.
No one reads what you mean to say. They read what you DO say. And what you said was that a character who calls herself gay is "pretty obviously bisexual" despite her own words otherwise. At no point did you say "it's not beyond the realm of possibility to have her attracted to a man." (Personally, I don't disagree with that. I think that with the right development it could definitely be possible, but that's neither here nor there.)
It's your poor fortune if you can't tell the difference between the statement that you did make and the one that you wanted to.