The Seventh

[anticirclejerk]

RP HATE MEME

Go nuts. Namedrop, rant, rave, and wank up a storm.

NEWEST PAGE

Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Game Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report threads here.

I am going to delete all the dumb, aspergers worthy discussion threads.

this is not the place for talking about butts and farts and shrimp. take that to your plurk or rpanons.

also, to anyone in that plurk because i know you're furiously f5ing this meme and shlicking to the idea of being namedropped, maybe you should stop blaming the hate meme and start blaming the two-faced bitches you associate with who leak your private shit.

hth, mouthbreathing motherfuckers.

"No kidding. This breach of privacy can be argued on the fact that the people posting the caps were given permission to be in the private links. So the fault isn't on Anticirclejerk or the ACJ mod, but the component that decided to make the screencap." - Anon

Comments

ayrt

[(Anonymous)]

are you a fucking idiot?

like that isn't what I said at all.

what I said was no it's not beyond the realm of possibility to have her attracted to a man and after hearing the full context of what Leca's doing with it.

I.

THINK.

IT'S.

DISGUSTING.

because you're dealing with a character that was really mistreated in regards to sexuality. you need to tread lightly no matter what you're doing, especially if you're taking her from the canon point you are so maybe there's no need to imply a lot of really hideous shit about me before knowing the whole fucking story.

Re: ayrt

[(Anonymous)]

LOL That's cute backtracking there, but you'll notice from the fact that I quoted your exact words that that is indeed exactly what you said.

If you want someone not to call you on on what you say then get your facts straight first and (here's the kicker) think about what your words are actually saying before you click post.

No one reads what you mean to say. They read what you DO say. And what you said was that a character who calls herself gay is "pretty obviously bisexual" despite her own words otherwise. At no point did you say "it's not beyond the realm of possibility to have her attracted to a man." (Personally, I don't disagree with that. I think that with the right development it could definitely be possible, but that's neither here nor there.)

It's your poor fortune if you can't tell the difference between the statement that you did make and the one that you wanted to.

Re: ayrt

[(Anonymous)]

like i said to the below anon this was a stupid as fuck move on my behalf to reply in the first place both a) without knowing the full story and b) for not being clearer in my explanation.

sorry for being a dumbass and not thinking fully about what i said before i type. agree with you guys on the handling of this. agree that this was my bad to even comment in the first place.