RP Hate Meme ♥ (
anticirclejerk) wrote2012-04-09 09:56 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
The Seventh
Go nuts. Namedrop, rant, rave, and wank up a storm.
NEWEST PAGE
Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Game Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report threads here.
I am going to delete all the dumb, aspergers worthy discussion threads.
this is not the place for talking about butts and farts and shrimp. take that to your plurk or rpanons.
also, to anyone in that plurk because i know you're furiously f5ing this meme and shlicking to the idea of being namedropped, maybe you should stop blaming the hate meme and start blaming the two-faced bitches you associate with who leak your private shit.
hth, mouthbreathing motherfuckers.
"No kidding. This breach of privacy can be argued on the fact that the people posting the caps were given permission to be in the private links. So the fault isn't on Anticirclejerk or the ACJ mod, but the component that decided to make the screencap." - Anonhth, mouthbreathing motherfuckers.
Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2012-04-09 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)Like, a network? That's grandfather claused in, suspension of disbelief, apparently some people really like having it. Regains? I hope you have a good in-universe motivation for them, but OK. Completely wacky funtimesy events every month? O... kay...
But after a point it just gets to be too much of a cliche storm for me. I understand why we have the cliche storm that is a spooky jamjar, they're part of a panfandom game's easiest method of construction. Many of the associated cliches I list, though, are less demanded by the genre. It just bothers me when people don't even seem to think first about whether their particular game really has to have, or logically should have, these particular things.
Then again, this whole problem highlights how little creative thought some founders/mods put into their games anyway... *siiiiiigh*
Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2012-04-09 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)Of course, this all branches into the side of the pool that "takes RP too srsly" so you'll seldom hear bitching about it.
Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 12:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 04:34 am (UTC)(link)Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 08:53 am (UTC)(link)I loved this setup so much. I had to drop to a slower game that uses communicators and I miss mingle posts so much. How the hell is my character supposed to establish anything with someone if their primary mode of contact is via network and face-to-face interaction is commonly handwaved?
I really wish other games dropped the network thing completely. You don't need it, and it's possible to get shit done without it. I remember people setting up network comms as alternatives to the dreaded prose logs that took too long; action threads weren't popular at the time. Now that we've got the short and sweet action threads, we don't need networks. I seriously think newly made games should consider going without it.
Re: GAME PET PEEVES
(Anonymous) 2012-04-10 10:08 am (UTC)(link)