The Ninth

[anticirclejerk]

RP HATE MEME

Go nuts. Namedrop, rant, rave, and wank up a storm.

NEWEST PAGE

Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Game Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report threads here.

I am going to delete all the dumb, aspergers worthy discussion threads.

this is not the place for talking about butts and farts and shrimp. take that to your plurk or rpanons.

"No kidding. This breach of privacy can be argued on the fact that the people posting the caps were given permission to be in the private links. So the fault isn't on Anticirclejerk or the ACJ mod, but the component that decided to make the screencap." - Anon

Comments

Re: dda

[(Anonymous)]

It's the power of anonymity, and the very same reason plenty of anons are calling Jade a 'bitch', admitting that they will actively avoid her, and telling her to drop all while anon and not to her face. She has offered an opt-out post as well. If others do not wish their opting-out to be public, it's easy enough to pm her instead.

The apples have virus like capabilities. The plot with Kefka was to experiment on the apples, which are Eris-grade enchantments that mimic viruses and not DDD-level of potency. So, the mods must have asked Kefka-mun, too. Kefka's a god, DM's power was given by Eris. I'm assuming from this a plot to manipulate virus-like qualities in Eris' apples was formed. If she asked about it, she was possibly seeing how much DM and Kefka would be able to succeed in their experiment and how much they would be able to change in the apples. It's true that this plot was turned down. So. She must have spoken with Kefka-mun about this, too, in which case this request not only by her, but also by Kefka-mun.

Yes, the anon requested 'proof' that others go and ask those named should be un-anon, and the one that made the sock should also be unanon. In a perfectly fearless world, there would be no anons. Remember that this entire thread is under the impression that the default assumed for players at DDD is that they are against Jade. This same impression was imposed by those against Jade. Whether most people at DDD are in support of her dropping or not I have no idea at this point. What does seem to be fact is that bias in this ACJ thread, at least, is skewed towards favor in support of Greedmun and wanting Jade to drop or be actively avoided. Hypocrisy is found everywhere on anon memes. That others become entitled to call others out or to action for whatever reason is simply an unfortunate fact.

Re: dda

[(Anonymous)]

This is a circular argument. Even those in her support admit that the evidence is suspicious. Some of us don't want to risk that. Nor should we have to. If she tags me, I'll tag back but that doesn't mean I should have to do anything I'm not comfortable with, which includes tagging her.

Right after he crited her, BRS tagged Greed on a plotting post. It went: "Jade wants to know if I can beat Greed up. Sorry, this wasn't my idea, haha". That seems more than a little strange, to me.

I can't say what the mods did or didn't do. I know they asked Jade on the thread about their abilities. Based on what Kefka and DM could do, they were allowed to experiment but fail on the apples. Jade was going to do something she admitted was out of DM's abilities if it was okay with the mods.

Re: dda

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, the suspicion still stands for the second case. But for the first case? She took crit well and improved. That alone should be enough to not hold so much doubt. I still recommend using the opt out post. It is as reasonable as harboring that suspicion in the first place. You cannot only focus on one suspicious incidence and completely ignore the one with no suspicion of wank on her part.

Plotting is continuous. I remember reading that, too. I don't have the link in front of me, but I do remember that BRSmun said Jade said it would be along the lines of coincidence. That's plotting for you. If anything, that's evidence for taking crit well by the person giving the crit, by continuing to want to plot with him. It's good evidence for Greedmun's attitude as well, that he went right back to plotting with her. BRSmun was new at the time, so she could have helped with some CR between them. In the very same crit thread in question, she also went right back to plotting with him, no hard feelings. Greedmun is capable of terminating plotting at anytime if he did not want CR.

Her abilities at the time were her own and whatever was given to her by Eris, and that is it. That's why Kefka-mun and Jade asked the mods first, stating their abilities because I'm certain the mods asked, to see if it was within both of their abilities to manipulate the powers in the apples. If they did not receive permission or seek it for herself and Kefka-mun, only then would they potentially be doing something not within their abilities. Your final statement is an assumption.

Re: dda

[starblaze]

I realized long ago that the way I worded the suggestion to Greedmun then was awkward and had implications that I didn't intend to have. If you want the short story, Jade did suggest that BRS could attack Greed since Greed was already aggravating Shooter while she was in a very unstable state of mind and she had possession of DM's worldhop device.

I just want to make it clear that Shooter's actions against Greed had IC reason and that it wasn't some sort of scheme to somehow get back at Greedmun. Jade was only pointing out an IC opportunity and I made the mistake of wording the suggestion that made it seem like it had ulterior ooc motives. I'm sorry that it seemed that way.