The Tenth

[anticirclejerk]

RP HATE MEME

Go nuts. Namedrop, rant, rave, and wank up a storm.

NEWEST PAGE

Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Game Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report threads here.

I am going to delete all the dumb, aspergers worthy discussion threads.

this is not the place for talking about butts and farts and shrimp. take that to your plurk or rpanons.

"No kidding. This breach of privacy can be argued on the fact that the people posting the caps were given permission to be in the private links. So the fault isn't on Anticirclejerk or the ACJ mod, but the component that decided to make the screencap." - Anon

the best trek 4 hours ago
Yeah go back to whiteknighting your creepy friend.
a hero to us all

IF YOU COMPARE THIS COMMUNITY TO CYBERBULLYING, YOU'RE A PIECE OF SHIT. HTH.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

And I hold my ground on that, for me,

FOR ME

Look, headcanon.

Honestly, it's up for personal interpretation whether it's "rebirth" or "reincarnation" and I think telling people how they must read ambiguous canon is a bit pretentious, anon.

[(Anonymous)]

I never denied it being headcanon. I always stated clearly that it was MY opinion. Neither I denied it being "headcanon".

So, once more, wtf are you complaining about besides that I bothered to explain things other anons were asking about? Or do you mean that since I do have a personal opinion about this I shouldn't have said a word?

[(Anonymous)]

And yes I repeated myself up there, that's how much I don't get why you are complaining /facepalm at self there

pa

[(Anonymous)]

I think you're confusing me for the other anon, because that above comment was the first time I posted to this thread.

I'm just saying that you're presenting your interpretation as canon fact and getting huffy when people point that out. The fact remains that your interpretation is YOUR INTERPRETATION and should be stated as such.

Re: pa

[(Anonymous)]

I'm sorry if I'm confusing you with another anon. But, again, I don't think I've ever said "THIS IS CANON GUYS" I've stated several times that it was indeed MY INTERPRETATION, and I don't see why you're saying I've done otherwise. I'm "getting huffy" because at least two people are assuming that I've said things I haven't. Seriously, please, quote me for where I'm saying that what I've said is a "canon fact" and not "my interpretation", because that's what you're accusing me of doing, yet the only thing you quoted was, precisely, a part where I said that it was, indeed, my own interpretation.