The Tenth

[anticirclejerk]

RP HATE MEME

Go nuts. Namedrop, rant, rave, and wank up a storm.

NEWEST PAGE

Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Game Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report threads here.

I am going to delete all the dumb, aspergers worthy discussion threads.

this is not the place for talking about butts and farts and shrimp. take that to your plurk or rpanons.

"No kidding. This breach of privacy can be argued on the fact that the people posting the caps were given permission to be in the private links. So the fault isn't on Anticirclejerk or the ACJ mod, but the component that decided to make the screencap." - Anon

the best trek 4 hours ago
Yeah go back to whiteknighting your creepy friend.
a hero to us all

IF YOU COMPARE THIS COMMUNITY TO CYBERBULLYING, YOU'RE A PIECE OF SHIT. HTH.

Comments

ayrt

[(Anonymous)]

Circumstantial evidence is stronger evidence than character witness "evidence". I didn't say I think she's guilty. I just think the "rational" anon being called rational means some people don't know what that word means. There's no proof she's guilty and a lack of proof doesn't make proof, so I don't know or care if she did it. I'm not whiteknighting anyone. I agree one of them needs to go and I don't really care which.

Re: ayrt

[(Anonymous)]

The 'rational' anon is rational in comparison to the anons that continue to say she is guilty, who are considerably more vocal than the anons that say she is innocent. The ones who are for her dropping and/or believe she is guilty remain stubborn in that they will not use an opt out post, when it has been proven their anxiety over using it is unnecessary by the first instance of given critique, in which the person who made wank was not her but Greedmun. If you believe she is neither, then you should also recognize that there is now enough suspicion and circumstance for others to be considered responsible.

[(Anonymous)]

Looks like he needs to drop.

[(Anonymous)]

That would undoubtedly cause even more complaints from both 'sides'. Neither should feel pressured to drop because of this.

[(Anonymous)]

After Rational Anon I don't think there's anyone left on Greedmun's 'side.' Jade's been proven completely innocent already.

[(Anonymous)]

No. There is no definite proof for the suspicions against her or this new-found suspicion against others. It is only suspicion, and only that. What has been proven is that (1) she can take crit well, (2) she does not create wank after receiving crit, (3) she can improve, (4) she does not special snowflake, and (5) she is not passive aggressive. 1-3's proof is from the first instance of crit. 4's proof comes from in-game examples across all her muses. 5's proof comes from her own behavior towards tagging others, among other things.

If anyone has suspicion against Greedmun, the same thing goes for him. It is only suspicion.

-1

[(Anonymous)]