anticirclejerk | The Eighth

Entry tags:

old post

The Eighth

RP HATE MEME

Go nuts. Namedrop, rant, rave, and wank up a storm.

NEWEST PAGE

Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Game Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report threads here.

I am going to delete all the dumb, aspergers worthy discussion threads.

this is not the place for talking about butts and farts and shrimp. take that to your plurk or rpanons.

"No kidding. This breach of privacy can be argued on the fact that the people posting the caps were given permission to be in the private links. So the fault isn't on Anticirclejerk or the ACJ mod, but the component that decided to make the screencap." - Anon

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

How's that Gallifreyian wedding coming about?

It's going to be a splendorous soiree of the highest caliber, complete with fingerfood, tiny cakes, and the classiest of ships.

It's a fucking trainwreck, what do you think?

Jesus Christ, can't we find something new to wank about? Yawn.

There really isn't anything else to wank about except that, tbh. Our game is pretty boring in terms of shitfests and wank as a general rule with the odd rare gems of batshit crazy.

We could talk about Riddle's hasty exit some more, but we all knew that was only a matter of time. And this wedding crap is pretty much the only thing wankworthy, but seeing as the Doctor-mun stopped plurking all PA about it, it's kind of losing steam.

We even have Mike in game and he hasn't even done anything weird yet.

Sorry, fellow anon. I wish I had better wank for you. :(

I'm waiting for it with anticipation. This trainwreck will be glorious.

I hope it goes down in RP history. :')

so who is in this supposed clique

I keep hearing about it but only like three people were mentioned

everyone is.

anons usually refer to pr, vil, whoever the fuck is that plays gabriel, castiel, raphael, aj, sara? I don't really see it though tbh.

I've never actually seen anons refer to Sara

What's her issue?

She has the gall to be friendly with everyone. In anon's mind, being friendly with 'the clique' makes her a part of it, even though she has CR with most of the game and has never dropped a tag as long as I've seen her play.

sara and amy actually respond when you tag them, though.

pr also responds, but with short/shitty tags that blatantly give you nowhere to go in response, thus ending the interaction quickly.

vil has other cliquers respond to warn your pup not to talk to luci, then ignores your tag.

aj just flat out ignores you.

and i don't even give a fuck who plays gabriel. they don't give a fuck about me, either. i call them 'that other one' and that works fine.

countdown until one of them makes a big plurk talking about how much anon is wrong and/or how much they don't care

Re: ADSTRINGENDUM

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:43 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ADSTRINGENDUM

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-23 12:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ADSTRINGENDUM

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-23 15:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ADSTRINGENDUM

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-23 16:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ADSTRINGENDUM

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-27 14:11 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-24 02:43 (UTC) - Expand

hey, anne. a lot of us agreed with your plurk comments. we just didn't say so on plurk. those lot dogpile and grudgewank like nobody's business. they also live in a bubble where their shit don't stink and they do nothing wrong. telling them otherwise gets you nowhere. posting anon accomplishes so much more, simply by annoying the shit out of them.

we are anon. we are the rest of the fucking game, assholes.

what are you trying to say with this comment

lol k

If you agree with Anne, who puts words in people's mouths and has no reading comprehension at all about anything and never finishes any threads because she's SO BUSY!!!, you're a dumbass and I hope you drop. Do us a favor and take her with you.

Woah dude take a minute.

I have my own issues with Anne's logic but "I hope you drop" is never a reasonable or proactive response to a disagreement, and jumping down their throat like that only makes it look like you're proving their point.

lol reasonable response on acj

For what it's worth, based on this comment of yours, I think YOU'RE a dumbass and I hope you drop. Take whatever friends you have with you, please, because I'm sure they're just as charming as you are.

For those of us not on plurk, what did Anne say?

She commented on the cliqueishness and got dogpiled with the same crap about how there isn't a clique at all and how people just need to make better posts, tag out more and try harder for CR.

I'll admit that Anne doesn't post/tag much, herself, but that doesn't make her points about the cliques WRONG. She, at least, neglects everyone equally - which leads one to believe it likely IS just her being busy.

For what it's worth, I also wanted to speak up to say her points were valid, but the rabid dogpiling is such a turn off.

Re: ADSTRINGENDUM

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 02:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ADSTRINGENDUM

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 03:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ADSTRINGENDUM

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 03:22 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 03:23 (UTC) - Expand

DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 03:49 (UTC) - Expand

DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 03:55 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 04:36 (UTC) - Expand

aYrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 04:46 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:21 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 04:47 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 04:55 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 04:56 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 04:57 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:18 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 04:50 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 04:52 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:16 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 03:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 04:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:41 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 06:11 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 06:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 06:51 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 04:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 04:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 04:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 04:53 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 04:54 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:05 (UTC) - Expand

someone else

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:07 (UTC) - Expand

sa

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:14 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:18 (UTC) - Expand

AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:25 (UTC) - Expand

AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:33 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:36 (UTC) - Expand

DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:37 (UTC) - Expand

AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:41 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 08:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-25 16:27 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:08 (UTC) - Expand

DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:35 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 06:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:03 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:56 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt.

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 05:59 (UTC) - Expand

DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 06:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 06:02 (UTC) - Expand

AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 06:05 (UTC) - Expand

sara is a fairy anon

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 06:11 (UTC) - Expand

AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 06:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 06:27 (UTC) - Expand

AYRT

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 06:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 06:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-04-22 06:46 (UTC) - Expand

we are anon. we are the rest of the fucking game, assholes.

Um, speak for yourself, please. I have no problems with discussing this issue, but you do not get to pretend that the whole game is either in the clique, or completely in line with your position. It isn't black or white, and you do not get to put words in the rest of our mouths.

do you understand paragraphs, anon? cos a new one generally means a separate thought of some kind.

since you're posting anon right now, i'm sorry, but you are anon and you are 'the rest of the fucking game'.

i never said we all think the same. i just said we're all the 'other people' in the very game the people in question are playing in.

> Reads this comment.
> Reads the shitstorm that followed.

1. Dogpiling - Check!
2. Grudgewank - Check!
3. People who think they do no wrong - Check!
4. Comments that get no one anywhere - Check!
5. Anon comments annoying the shit out of everyone - Check!

Holy shit. You all got played.

Same old, same old ito wank. The main issues here are ones that've been here for the last few posts. Only difference seems to be which former player(s) are getting hated on.

I guess it's easier for ugly people to wank when their object of interest isn't around to respond. God forbid they be turned down, right?

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only