RP Hate Meme ♥ (
anticirclejerk) wrote2012-05-07 01:15 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
The Tenth

RP HATE MEME
Go nuts. Namedrop, rant, rave, and wank up a storm.
NEWEST PAGE
Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Game Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report threads here.
I am going to delete all the dumb, aspergers worthy discussion threads.
this is not the place for talking about butts and farts and shrimp. take that to your plurk or rpanons.
"No kidding. This breach of privacy can be argued on the fact that the people posting the caps were given permission to be in the private links. So the fault isn't on Anticirclejerk or the ACJ mod, but the component that decided to make the screencap." - Anon
the best trek 4 hours ago
Yeah go back to whiteknighting your creepy friend.
a hero to us all
MAYFIELD
(Anonymous) 2012-05-07 07:59 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-08 01:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-10 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)HOLY HEIGHTS
(Anonymous) 2012-05-08 05:53 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-08 06:06 am (UTC)(link)aren't we still talking about Mayfield? You lost me.
HEAVENLY HILLS
(Anonymous) 2012-05-08 12:44 pm (UTC)(link)Re: HOLY HEIGHTS
(Anonymous) 2012-05-08 01:26 pm (UTC)(link)Heavenly Hills is the rip-off.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-08 06:52 pm (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2012-05-09 03:01 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-09 04:37 am (UTC)(link)Re: HOLY HEIGHTS
(Anonymous) 2012-05-11 03:54 pm (UTC)(link)Re: HOLY HEIGHTS
(Anonymous) 2012-05-11 04:23 pm (UTC)(link)Re: HOLY HEIGHTS
(Anonymous) 2012-05-11 04:17 pm (UTC)(link)as if it wasn't obvious before that you were whiteknighting your own game
wtg
Re: HOLY HEIGHTS
Re: HOLY HEIGHTS
(Anonymous) 2012-05-11 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)if it wasn't anonfail you wouldn't have deleted and pretended it was all on purpose by reposting (with different phrasing too)
Re: HOLY HEIGHTS
Re: HOLY HEIGHTS
(Anonymous) - 2012-05-11 16:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: HOLY HEIGHTS
Re: HOLY HEIGHTS
(Anonymous) - 2012-05-11 16:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: HOLY HEIGHTS
Re: HOLY HEIGHTS
(Anonymous) - 2012-05-11 16:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: HOLY HEIGHTS
Re: HOLY HEIGHTS
(Anonymous) - 2012-05-11 16:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: HOLY HEIGHTS
(Anonymous) - 2012-05-12 05:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: HOLY HEIGHTS
(Anonymous) - 2012-05-11 16:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: HOLY HEIGHTS
Re: HOLY HEIGHTS
(Anonymous) - 2012-05-11 19:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: HOLY HEIGHTS
(Anonymous) 2012-05-11 04:28 pm (UTC)(link)that is the weakest, most pathetic excuse i've ever seen for anonfail. you've contradicted yourself and pretty much fessed up to it in the process. just admit that you were anonymously whiteknighting your game instead of trying watery bullshit excuses that don't fly at all.
Re: HOLY HEIGHTS
Re: HOLY HEIGHTS
(Anonymous) - 2012-05-11 16:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: HOLY HEIGHTS
+1
(Anonymous) - 2012-05-11 16:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: HOLY HEIGHTS
As to the name? Yeah, we'd already made the communities by the time we found out that the two games would both be HH.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-11 04:24 pm (UTC)(link)The premise of Mayfield is a jamjar in a 50s setting where you are assigned houses. The premise of Heavenly Hills is for the most part the same. The 50s setting is really unique. If there was something obviously, clearly distinct about your game from Mayfield, that might be different. But there's not. You can't possibly be so blind as to really not know where the accusations of being a rip off are coming from.
Fortunately, your game is already a joke.
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-05-11 16:55 (UTC) - Expandnew anon
(Anonymous) - 2012-05-11 19:14 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2012-05-11 20:50 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2012-05-11 22:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: HOLY HEIGHTS
(Anonymous) 2012-05-11 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)Did you learn it?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-10 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)+1
(Anonymous) 2012-05-11 01:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-05-11 06:24 pm (UTC)(link)It's been a pain in the past when I was trying to contact someone for housing position and they were planning to idle and thus not looking at their PMs.
+1
(Anonymous) 2012-05-12 07:17 am (UTC)(link)It's not as if we all have our faces smashed against the screen, watching the drop page to catch every person who drops...
Re: MAYFIELD
(Anonymous) 2012-05-13 01:51 pm (UTC)(link)