anticirclejerk: (Jackles tears)
RP Hate Meme ♥ ([personal profile] anticirclejerk) wrote2012-04-28 12:18 pm
Entry tags:

The Ninth

RP HATE MEME


Go nuts. Namedrop, rant, rave, and wank up a storm.

NEWEST PAGE

Game Hate | Canon Hate | Namedropping | Game Pet Peeves | Meme Pet Peeves
Report threads here.

I am going to delete all the dumb, aspergers worthy discussion threads.

this is not the place for talking about butts and farts and shrimp. take that to your plurk or rpanons.

"No kidding. This breach of privacy can be argued on the fact that the people posting the caps were given permission to be in the private links. So the fault isn't on Anticirclejerk or the ACJ mod, but the component that decided to make the screencap." - Anon

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
> the people who brought concerns to the mods some months ago
> the people who are upset with her now
> people who's she'd had to have some cr with
> and Greedmun

So it's probably Naem, Tay, Mini, Koz, Jackie, Klavier-mun, Lancer-mun, Roze-mun, and Greedmun at the least, but from what was on rps it sounded like there was a lot more. If the anon who posted first under DDD and the +1 are to be believed, they don't tag her for OOC reasons. But if you look at the cr both DM and BRS combined have with all of them, that's a lot of hate for one person to result in boycotting a joint post altogether.

DA

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
Having an OOC reason to not tag someone isn't ~horrible~ or ~new~. That they made a joint post is their own decision.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
> Having an OOC reason to not tag someone isn't ~horrible~ or ~new~.
> She made an opt-out post.

If they didn't want tags from her, they could use that instead and only receive them from BRS. Ignoring a joint post all together makes them part of the problem as well, for giving up on BRS's CR.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
But it's not like they'd stop tagging BRS altogether. Like someone mentioned, it'd be going to extremes to ignore BRS-mun too just because she's affiliated with DM-mun.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 01:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 01:39 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
If it's really the people listed, I don't think they'd use the opt-out post. They used to get along fine with DM-mun so imagine how awkward it'd be if they suddenly came out admitting they don't want to tag with her. And it'd just generate more drama in general.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 01:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 01:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 01:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 01:52 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 01:54 (UTC) - Expand

dda

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 02:47 (UTC) - Expand

ddda

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 02:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 05:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 05:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 05:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 05:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 05:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 05:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 07:25 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 05:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 04:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 04:43 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 03:55 (UTC) - Expand

-1

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 04:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: -1

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 04:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: -1

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 04:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 05:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 05:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] tenminutes - 2012-05-06 10:47 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
I know Tay is good friends with Greedmun, and I'm pretty sure BRS has CR with most of Tay's muses.

Idk about Mini. She doesn't seem like a grudgewanker to me, being the target of some before.

sa

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
So it would be suspicious if Tay's part of it, and equally strange that most of her muses are ignoring a single post. So I'm pretty sure she's part of it and got Koz and Jackie into it, seeing as they're part of that clique.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
What about Jelle? She's close with them too.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 01:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 01:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 08:09 (UTC) - Expand
tenminutes: (Because I really don't care.)

Re: sa

[personal profile] tenminutes 2012-05-06 11:54 am (UTC)(link)
HI THERE. UHM.

...I don't comment on everyone's post within a day all the time? It took me like a week to reply to some of those virus posts. :| I'm totally not sorry for not tagging everything within 24 hours, idk about the rest of the people. "Most of my muses" though, I've only got like.. CR with Yuri and DM as far as I know. I haven't spotted an Issun post for Harumi or Natsume to comment in a while... (If it got posted somewhere I missed it because I suck, it's not thing personal.)

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 01:50 am (UTC)(link)
As none of the above, it's possible to have problems with her as a player and not be grudgewanking. I don't have CR with any of those three but I do see the special snowflaking and avoided her. Her responses to the godmod talk make me sure I never want to tag with her.

If she is the grudgewanker she's accused of being I am NOT putting myself in her sights by saying don't tag me. If she isn't a humongous wanker she's still very, very passive-aggressive.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
You know, I read that whole godmod OOC questions part. To me it seems like the mod's fault for approving it in the first place, because she said she did get mod approval, and she never used it without permission in the first place (that I know of).

+1

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
She's only used the power TWICE so far, once for the blind date plot with Morrigan and the other with Greed.

sa

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 02:01 am (UTC)(link)
And maybe I'm missing a part of the story, but how the hell does that make her godmoddy if she uses permission every time? It's like any other godmoddy character out there.

I special snowflake, Tay special snowflakes like hell, Koz special snowflakes, Jackie special snowflakes. If your definition of 'special snowfalking' uses DM-mun as a standard, everyone else in this game dose it ten times worse.

Re: sa

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 02:06 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 03:17 (UTC) - Expand

ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 04:49 (UTC) - Expand

sa

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 04:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 05:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 05:04 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 05:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 06:04 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 06:08 (UTC) - Expand

+1 da

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-06 07:19 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
what? i've never gotten any PA vibes from her. do you have any ooc threads links that demonstrate that?

+1

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
Same here. Don't know what the P/A thing is about (if anything, she seems exceedingly passive and compliant). The only thing I'm worried about is being wanked. I wouldn't use the opt-out post, and I think it's stupid she even made one. It's easy enough to avoid her quietly. ...but I suppose by doing so we all would be the more 'passive-aggressive' ones here.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
>> she seems exceedingly passive and compliant

Yeah. She's such an agreeable person I really don't know where the hell they got the impression she's obnoxious/PA.

Quietly avoiding her would just be as bad as wanking her to drop. What's the point of her staying if she doesn't know who wants CR and who doesn't, who to tag and who not to tag? The people avoiding her need to get over themselves. There are much worse players elsewhere. I guess having such a long period of peace at DDD made people oversensitive to the point where they'll tell a mun to drop over something that could've been easily and quietly fixed.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
Mini, Lancer-mun and Roze-mun don't have CR with her. Them not tagging it is not suspicious.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 02:03 am (UTC)(link)
I tied in Mini and Lancer-mun into her grudgewank because Greedmun and his defenders are accusing DM-mun for everything. Roze-mun was one of those that defended Greedmun in that post.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 03:04 am (UTC)(link)
... I thought it was established that she didn't make that secret bashing GreedxKlavier. Welp, guess I thought wrong.
potatochips: (Can you cut that out?)

[personal profile] potatochips 2012-05-06 02:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know wtf I'm doing on this list to be honest. I eat DM cr up like candy and simply totally missed that they had a post.
tenminutes: (Juice boxes are better that coffee.)

[personal profile] tenminutes 2012-05-06 07:38 pm (UTC)(link)
'Cuz it's a new post and people are flipping their shit over what at the time was a day-old post.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-06 07:54 pm (UTC)(link)
At this point they're just looking for any opportunity to attack DM and start screaming about how she should drop. Seeing a new post that didn't get a bajillion tags on the day it was posted was just another dumb excuse to start crap.
glimmerous_fop: (♪ cool calm collected)

[personal profile] glimmerous_fop 2012-05-07 05:19 am (UTC)(link)
As much as I like this whole ready-fire-aim deal, you can remove me from your list. I'm not a witch hunter, I have no quarrels with anyone that I'm aware of, I take no sides...and no one has influenced me to take any sides. I'm not upset with anyone, I haven't talked to any mods about anything. The reason for this is that I don't have a clue about what's going on and I would appreciate it if things remained that way.

(Anonymous) 2012-05-07 08:10 am (UTC)(link)
I wasn't going to reply because whoa this thread got messy, buuuut the reason I put you, Mini, and Lancermun down was because iirc Greedmun (and others?) still suspect the secret that was released involving those pairings was made by her too.The others were mentioned because I know for a fact they have CR with both BRS and DM, and there looks like there is a "Tay's Clique" involving Tay, Jackie, Koz, and Jelle. Rozemun was only mentioned because I saw her comment on the secrets post defending Greedmun. It's on the next secrets post targeting DDDers that Greedmun's defenders are giving a lot of hate towards one person. Naem was mentioned because they have CR with DM. The first anon here made the assumption that her CR was ignoring her, other anons agreed, and that's really all there is to it. More anons got carried away with what was me thinking this was casual speculation. You can be sure I won't be nameddropping anyone in the future if this mess of a thread is the result.

sa

(Anonymous) 2012-05-07 08:21 am (UTC)(link)
To add: as for the not-name dropped individuals, I'd still put them at number one for being grudgewankers. Grudges do seem to be left over from the complaits brought to the mods that were apparently fixed upon from months ago. ... although naming those anons really would be pulling names out of my arse.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 09:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 10:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 10:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 10:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 10:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 10:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 10:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 10:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 11:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 11:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 11:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 11:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 13:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 13:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 13:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 13:44 (UTC) - Expand

DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 14:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 14:49 (UTC) - Expand

dda

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 20:01 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 14:36 (UTC) - Expand

ayart

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 14:51 (UTC) - Expand

sa

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 15:16 (UTC) - Expand

+1000

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 19:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 20:02 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 20:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 20:19 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 20:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 20:23 (UTC) - Expand

DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 20:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 21:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 22:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 22:12 (UTC) - Expand

Re: +1

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 22:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 22:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 22:15 (UTC) - Expand

DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 23:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 23:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 00:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 00:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: DA

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 00:49 (UTC) - Expand

dda

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 00:52 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 01:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 03:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: dda

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 03:57 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 04:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 04:57 (UTC) - Expand

Re: dda

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 04:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: dda

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 05:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: dda

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 05:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: dda

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 06:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: dda

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 06:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: dda

[personal profile] starblaze - 2012-05-08 06:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 05:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 06:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 06:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 15:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 06:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 06:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 07:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 07:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 07:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 07:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-08 07:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 22:27 (UTC) - Expand

+1

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-07 22:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-10 20:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2012-05-11 02:40 (UTC) - Expand